<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Please Vote For Me (2007)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coursedescriptionincluded.com/2010/01/please-vote-for-me-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coursedescriptionincluded.com/2010/01/please-vote-for-me-2007/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=please-vote-for-me-2007</link>
	<description>not just movies that suck</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2011 05:20:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fixated</title>
		<link>http://www.coursedescriptionincluded.com/2010/01/please-vote-for-me-2007/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Fixated</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2011 05:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coursedescriptionincluded.com/?p=218#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Had Luo Lei lost the election, it would have completely been his father&#039;s fault. Luo Lei did not need such bribery to win the election. Also the last scene (after he gets elected) suggests that he was a good leader (of course, it is subjective). In the first interaction between Luo Lei and his parents, Luo Lei utters words too good and all leaders should (in an ideal world) take a leaf out of it. He clearly tells his parents that he doesn&#039;t want to manipulate/influence/mislead the minds of his fellow students. He wants them to think and choose on their own.

@Engine: I thought Luo Lei was extremely articulate (his speech towards the end). The movie also suggests that he prepared his speech without the help of his parents unlike the other two. Also he could memorize it well suggesting that Luo Lei is very intelligent. Xiaofei was a sweet girl and her mother was not as vicious as the other mothers. And I thought Cheng Cheng was through and through dictatorial material :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Had Luo Lei lost the election, it would have completely been his father&#8217;s fault. Luo Lei did not need such bribery to win the election. Also the last scene (after he gets elected) suggests that he was a good leader (of course, it is subjective). In the first interaction between Luo Lei and his parents, Luo Lei utters words too good and all leaders should (in an ideal world) take a leaf out of it. He clearly tells his parents that he doesn&#8217;t want to manipulate/influence/mislead the minds of his fellow students. He wants them to think and choose on their own.</p>
<p>@Engine: I thought Luo Lei was extremely articulate (his speech towards the end). The movie also suggests that he prepared his speech without the help of his parents unlike the other two. Also he could memorize it well suggesting that Luo Lei is very intelligent. Xiaofei was a sweet girl and her mother was not as vicious as the other mothers. And I thought Cheng Cheng was through and through dictatorial material <img src='http://www.coursedescriptionincluded.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: engine</title>
		<link>http://www.coursedescriptionincluded.com/2010/01/please-vote-for-me-2007/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>engine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 04:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coursedescriptionincluded.com/?p=218#comment-19</guid>
		<description>you forgot to tag this as

although i did not at first, i was really rooting for the fat kid in the underwear (cheng cheng) toward the end. i found luo lei to be grossly unqualified to be a public figure, someone who ruled primarly by force and pork barrel spending (the monorail class trip). he sort of reminded me of dub-yah bush—in that his father seemed to be driving his campaign, while he had very few ideas of his own. his own inability to articulate thoughts and think for himself also made luo seem like a puppet in his father&#039;s need to extend his power into a third grade classroom. cheng cheng, despite the machialian tendencies, appeared to have a good balance of intelligence, conscience, and flaws. i particularly relished the scene when he shoos his mother into another room because he&#039;s embarrassed to practice his speech in front of her—not because he was in his toony underwear, but simply because he didn&#039;t feel like the speech was ready to be judged.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you forgot to tag this as</p>
<p>although i did not at first, i was really rooting for the fat kid in the underwear (cheng cheng) toward the end. i found luo lei to be grossly unqualified to be a public figure, someone who ruled primarly by force and pork barrel spending (the monorail class trip). he sort of reminded me of dub-yah bush—in that his father seemed to be driving his campaign, while he had very few ideas of his own. his own inability to articulate thoughts and think for himself also made luo seem like a puppet in his father&#8217;s need to extend his power into a third grade classroom. cheng cheng, despite the machialian tendencies, appeared to have a good balance of intelligence, conscience, and flaws. i particularly relished the scene when he shoos his mother into another room because he&#8217;s embarrassed to practice his speech in front of her—not because he was in his toony underwear, but simply because he didn&#8217;t feel like the speech was ready to be judged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

